Mobile navigation

COLUMN 

It’s all about Trump (well, almost)

The US president featured prominently in the latest Pulitzer Prizes, with good reason.

By James Evelegh

It’s all about Trump (well, almost)
The New York Times won the prize for 'Investigative Reporting'.

The winners of this year’s Pulitzer Prizes were awarded in May, celebrating the best of US journalism. With America sliding down the World Press Freedom Index, it’s perhaps not surprising that many of the winners focused on the creeping authoritarianism of the US government.

President Trump provided the subject matter for four of the winning entries:

  • Public Service (The Washington Post): For piercing the veil of secrecy around the Trump administration’s chaotic overhaul of federal agencies and chronicling in rich detail the human impacts of the cuts and the consequences for the country.
  • Investigative Reporting (Staff of The New York Times): For deeply reported stories that exposed how President Trump has shattered constraints on conflicts of interest and exploited the moneymaking opportunities that come with power, enriching his family and allies.
  • Local Reporting (Staff of the Chicago Tribune): For its powerful coverage of the Trump administration’s militarized immigration sweep of the city that described in vivid, muscular prose how the siege-like incursion of ICE agents unified Chicagoans in resistance.
  • National Reporting (Staff of Reuters, notably Ned Parker, Linda So, Peter Eisler and Mike Spector): For documenting how the president used the U.S. government and the influence of his supporters to expand executive power and exact vengeance on his foes.

But… the US president wasn’t the only subject worthy of award-winning press attention:

  • Breaking News Reporting (Staff of The Minnesota Star Tribune): For its coverage of a shooting at a back-to-school Mass at a Catholic school that left two children dead and 28 wounded, powerful stories marked by thoroughness and compassion.
  • Explanatory Reporting (Susie Neilson, Megan Fan Munce and Sara DiNatale of the San Francisco Chronicle): For their series “Burned,” which showed how insurance companies using algorithmic tools have failed Californians who lost their homes to fire by systematically undervaluing their properties, denying claims and making it impossible for them to rebuild.
  • Beat Reporting (Jeff Horwitz and Engen Tham of Reuters): For inventive and revelatory reporting on Meta that detailed the technology company’s willingness to expose users, including children, to scams and AI manipulation.
  • International Reporting (Dake Kang, Garance Burke, Byron Tau, Aniruddha Ghosal and Yael Grauer, contributor, of Associated Press): For an astonishing global investigation into state-of-the-art tools of mass surveillance, created in Silicon Valley, advanced in China and spreading worldwide before returning to America for secret new uses by the U.S. Border Patrol.
  • Breaking News Photography (Saher Alghorra, contributor, The New York Times): For his haunting, sensitive series showing the devastation and starvation in Gaza resulting from the war with Israel.

The press might be under unprecedented attack in the US, but it is fighting back, which should be something all right-minded Americans are pleased about.

(A full list of the winners can be seen on the Pulitzer website.)


You can catch James Evelegh’s regular column in the InPubWeekly newsletter, which you can register to receive here.