News 

Society backs government clampdown on use of SLAPPs

The Society of Editors has welcomed an announcement by the Ministry of Justice of the government’s commitment to clamp down on so-called Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs).

Society backs government clampdown on use of SLAPPs
Dawn Alford: “SLAPPs not only have a chilling effect on the public’s right to know but they pose a grave threat to media freedom.” Photograph: Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash.

Expected to be announced today (17 March) by Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab MP, the government will set out its proposals to accelerate plans for reforms and consult on measures to tackle the use of SLAPPs. Proposals include strengthening legislation, introducing new court checks to curb their use and capping the costs that claimants can recover with the aim of stopping the super-rich, such as Russian oligarchs, from ‘weaponising’ the high cost of litigation to stifle free speech.

Dawn Alford, Executive Director of the Society of Editors said: “At a time when the vital role of journalists in holding power to account and exposing wrong-doing and corruption have never been more important, the Society welcomes the Government’s consultation on measures to tackle the use of SLAPPs.

“Deployed by powerful individuals and companies in an effort to silence and intimidate critics and deter legitimate public interest journalism, SLAPPs not only have a chilling effect on the public’s right to know but they pose a grave threat to media freedom. It is essential that laws are strengthened and practical deterrents are put in place to ensure that journalists – as well as campaigners, academics and authors – are able to fulfil their role in keeping the public informed without fear of intimidation or harassment.”

SLAPPs typically involve wealthy people or large businesses using the threat of endless legal action and associated costs to pressure their opponents under defamation and privacy laws. Earlier this month the High Court dismissed a libel claim against the British journalist, Tom Burgis, brought by a Kazakh-owned mining firm for his book ‘Kleptopia: How Dirty Money is Conquering the world’.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: “The ability of a free press to hold the powerful to account is fundamental to our democracy and as a former journalist I am determined we must never allow criticism to be silenced. For the oligarchs and super-rich who can afford these sky-high costs the threat of legal action has become a new kind of lawfare. We must put a stop to its chilling effect.”

Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Dominic Raab said: “The Government will not tolerate Russian oligarchs and other corrupt elites abusing British courts to muzzle those who shine a light on their wrongdoing.

“We’re taking action to put an end to this bullying and protect our free press.”

Michelle Stanistreet, General Secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) said: “The NUJ warmly welcomes the commitment by the Government to tackle the scourge that is the deployment of SLAPPs and other forms of lawfare cynically designed to stymie journalistic investigations and reporting by the rich and thin-skinned.

“We have long campaigned for low-cost arbitration solutions to settle genuine disputes and would welcome any moves to level the playing field and ensure journalists and media outlets no longer have to face prohibitive costs and deliberate intimidation by wealthy litigants with the deepest of pockets. For too long the super-rich have got away with abusing the law to bully journalists and undermine media freedom.

“The NUJ will consider the detail of these plans, and looks forward to participating in the government’s consultation on its package of measures.”

Other measures being proposed would enable courts to throw out claims using SLAPP tactics earlier in proceedings and impose Civil Restraint Orders to prevent people from bringing repeated legal challenges. Proposals also include amending the Defamation Act 2013 to strengthen the ‘public interest defence’ which protects people who publish private information from being sued if it was done for the public good. Ministers are also considering changes that could see the introduction of a specific requirement for claimants to prove ‘Actual Malice’ by a defendant in libel cases in order to deter spurious claims.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has already issued new guidance on conduct in disputes, identifying SLAPPs as an example of ‘pursuing litigation for improper purposes’ and reminding solicitors of their duty to report misconduct.


Keep up-to-date with publishing news: sign up here for InPubWeekly, our free weekly e-newsletter.